[Week 2 Here We Go Science]
Including the four examples used in our experiment, the
differences of each canvas played a major role in the results found for each
group. For example when using the
marbles on a linoleum floor, the results of momentum gained seemed to decrease
by ½ its speed; due to patterns within the floors surface. The rate of speed gained, as well as
decreasing halt speeds were considered in calculating the distance and speed. The observation began using two taped
meter sticks to a floor at a width just wide enough for one marble. The marbles were then placed in the middle of
the meter sticks at least 10 cm apart from each other. The first marble must be
flicked so it hits the second one where each leaner is asked to discuss within
their groups, the change in velocity, momentum, and also why.
On the Granite counter-tops, each marble seemed to move at a
constant, though the bigger marble clearly moved faster drawing the conclusion
their was more mass in the larger than the smaller of the two. As both came to a constant stop the smaller
marble came to complete halt at a faster rate than the larger. As the students took different turns flicking
one onto the other, it was noticed the closer the impact of the marbles the
less the distanced travelled and vice verse.
The farther away the impact the longer the distance each marble
travelled, due to the friction delivered on the initial impact; increasing the
momentum on impact of delivery. The side
walk produced a different result in itself, as it appeared to be with
cracks and crevices; which definitely played a major role in distance travelled
and momentum gained after impact. Within the Inquiry Learning Cycle of the elaboration component, my
learners engage through directing the researched information in group
discussion relative to real-world situations.
In regards to engineering this experiment will provide my learners with
the opportunity of creating innovative ideas, within their respective groups
amongst peers.
Problems occurred during this experiment were mostly contributed
uneven surfaces, cracks, and crevices.
What worked well was having the meter sticks to provide a divider
between each marble (This permitted the marbles from crossing into their
respective lanes while experimenting was taking place). In the next experiment, as a class we would
benefit in using a larger variety of surfaces.
It was non-expectant of the rates of speed the marbles obtained on the
linoleum floors as oppose to the granite counter-tops, the wooden table, and
outside counter-tops. Towards the end of
the experiment, however, my learners were making predictions of what would happen
in that particular scenario. To make
upgrades to this experiment we have decided to create different surfaces, for example,
and uphill wooden surface with partitions re-directing the marbles to the
center of the surface as they travel uphill until losing momentum. The goals and expectations presented to my
class were achieved throughout the duration of this experiment. During reflection period, they were able to
explain the differences of momentum on a given surface using marbles.
Resources
Guide to Science Fair Projects © 2003 by Nancy K. O'Leary and Susan Shelly.
Web Article: Lantz, H. B. (2009). What should be the function of a K–12 STEM education? SEEN Magazine, 11(3).
http://www.seenmagazine.us/Sections/ArticleDetail/tabid/79/ArticleID/208/smid/403/reftab/292/Default.aspx
Website: TEACH Engineering: The Engineering Design
Process
http://www.teachengineering.org/engrdesignprocess.php
Walden Library Article: Capobianco, B. M., &
Tyrie, N. (2009). Problem solving by design. Science & Children,
47(2), 38–41.http://www.teachengineering.org/engrdesignprocess.php
No comments:
Post a Comment